May 28, 2010

Ban on New Offshore Drilling Won’t Affect Electricity Prices, it is Purely Political.

Oil Rigs We. Do. Not. Burn. Oil. For. Electricity (in any significant way).  The search for alternative energy sources will theoretically reduce our dependence on coal, NOT on foreign oil.

This meme is so ingrained I do not know how many times I have to tell MYSELF that these two things are not really related.
His Fraudulency, Chairman Zero, broke his nearly year long abstinence on press conferences to address the Gulf Oil Spill.  He blathered on for nearly an hour and then he announced (with barely concealed glee I am sure) that there would be a ban on new offshore oil drilling.  So much for opening new areas to exploration, eh?
Obama, holding China (!) up as a role model for our future, touted their push toward “alternative energy” when reports indicate that their coal usage is increasing.  China may indeed be looking at alternative energy sources, but they are drilling like crazy anywhere they suspect there is oil and leveling whole mountains looking for more coal.  They are rushing headlong to a title match for Lone Superpower Status, at a time when the champ is sending the message that it doesn’t even want to be champ. 

But alternative energy sources such as they are will not affect our oil usage for theunicorn tears foreseeable future.  Cars run on oil.  Most alternative energy research, theory, dreaming,  is aimed at electrical generation.  Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Hydroelectric, Wave Power, Nuclear, Unicorn Tears are all meant for electrical generation.  Currently most of our electrical generation is accomplished by that other most hated industry, Coal Mining.

Oil makes Gasoline, Diesel and other fuels…that we primarily use for moving vehicles.
Chevy_Volt_Pre_Production The most famous “green” automobiles, the Prius and all the other Hybrids,  do not have an electrical outlet anywhere on them.  The Chevy Volt, still months away at best, can only go 40 miles on battery power, and then uses a gas engine.  Another sticking point with the Volt is price, at probably $35,000, it is not going to be a car for the masses.


The Unicorn Tear Powered Car is all ready to go, however, we are just waiting on the Unicorn Tears.

The Ban on Offshore Drilling will not in and of itself make us safer, in fact it will likely make us less safe.  Until Gasoline hits $4 a gallon (heaven help us) people will not slow down their driving much.  Other things will be eliminated first.   This will push our reliance to MORE foreign sources at a time when the Middle East is about to explode, we will be buying more oil from OPEC and really NONE of those countries are our allies.  We will be helping our enemies, funding them, allowing them to achieve their (evil) dreams and schemes.  This will potentially create a disaster that will make the Oil Spill seem a pretty trifling business.

All of this just reinforces these points;

Solar Power – doesn’t work where it is cloudy, is expensive, takes hundreds of acres is-the-sun-setting-on-solar-power-in-spain_1 to be worthwhile, and takes more water to keep it cool than we can afford, plus the environmentalists block the water diversion and usage.

Wind Power – The liberal elites were recently victorious on keeping windmills (4 miles) off the coast of Nantucket, so although they want them in theory, they don’t want them spoiling their view or in their backyard.  Again, environmentalists hate them because they kill birds.  And they only work in areas with reliable wind.

Geothermal – would work great, except we need some sort of Unobtanium element as yet undiscovered to keep the heat and corrosion from eating up any kind of turbine.
windFarm4
Hydroelectric – Awesome.  Too bad we are pretty much out of rivers to dam, and the environmentalists won’t let us anyway.

Wave Power – well obviously it only works near the coasts.  Certain kinds of coasts.  And mother nature has a tendency to destroy the little flapper thingy’s.

Nuclear – for some reason completely and totally unacceptable despite the French and the Chinese using it everywhere.  The one time I want to be like the French and the only time the liberal effete are against it.coal_hands

So…what is left…Unicorn Tears?  Coal.  Coal is what makes electricity and the United States has more than any other nation, making our electricity potentially the cheapest in the world.  Not to mention we do use a lot of hydro-power and it is both clean and cheap.

The only close to viable alternatives for automobile fuel is Ethanol.  But burning food is a bad idea.  Making ethanol from biomass is either incredibly stinky, and environmentally unfriendly as well; or causes food, and more importantly animal feed, prices to skyrocket making $5 a gallon milk a real possibility.  Animals eat mostly corn.  Even if you are a vegan, so much farmland would have to be farmed in corn that vegans would starve too.  Oh and uh…Tractors, Combines, and OTR trucks won't run on the stuff. Some of the newest tractors can burn 300 gallons of Diesel a day. Never mind that fuel mileage on ethanol is craptastic.

Main point being, alternative energy is not feasible, at least not yet, and even if it were it does not power our cars; and probably never will.

No, banning oil exploration and drilling is political.  More importantly all this driving we do is really liberating to the masses allowing us to travel for work and for leisure.  Our automobiles allow us to broaden our horizons and be self reliant.  These are concepts that are totally against the progressive agenda.  Progressives and Socialists thrive where there is misery and fail where there is prosperity.  That is why Oil, Coal, and Nuclear energy is bad… because it enables freedom.  With liberty and freedom we will look to ourselves and each other, and not to Government, and that will ruin THEIR way of life.
-KOOK

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Your right. Banning offshore oil drilling is purely political. We've struck upon shale in Western PA and now the enviro whackos are fighting against mining that shale. These libtards only care about making people reliant on government and not about helping the individual.
You are correct on all points. However, I believe that the spike in fuel/energy prices (desired by politicians and oil companies alike) will come sooner rather than later. Hurricane season is nearing and in my 20 years of following the tropics, I have never seen all conditions lining up so perfectly for a nightmare hurricane season. 2005 which is the benchmark for hyperactive seasons didn't come close. If just one big storm gets into the Gulf of Mexico, the Obama regime along with their oil baron pals will have their excuse to double if not triple their prices. Not only will energy prices be a big issue, but fears of a "black hurricane" are being privately mulled over by the so called experts. In the "black hurricane" scenario a strong hurricane moves into the Gulf of Mexico, then becomes impregnated with oil from the deepwater Horizon spill. The Hurricane then moves ashore dumping a mixture of water, oil and chemical oil dispersants inland for hundreds of miles. Black storm or not, the total lack of action by the Federal Government in responding to this disaster should serve notice to all that there will be NO federal response to a landfalling hurricane or any other disaster, natural or otherwise. We will have to fend for ourselves meaning surviving for months before help comes. Much of the reason to expect a lack of response is the upcoming November elections. Obama would not touch federal money left in TARP or in the bailout funds because he has promised it to his croneys to prop up their political campaigns. This is the real reason that there has been so much stalling and lack of permit pulling regarding the plan already in place to protect the wetlands in Louisiana from oil intrusion. Does anyone think things will be different in the aftermath of a lanfalling hurricane...or a bomb going off in a big city...or a crisis along the Arizona border? Ask yourself why Obama only sent 1200 National Guards to AZ but placed a price tag worth 6000 troops per year...can anyone tell me the leftover money isn't going into campaign funds of liberal Obama supporters such as Crist, Feinstein,..etc.?
The PLAN has always been to get us out of our cars. Here on CNN international they are asking, highly obnoxious, questions like (in their most serious, hushed voices) "Do we think an environmental catastrophe of this magnitude will FINALLY force the American consumption of energy which, per capita, is vastly higher than the rest of the worlds down to more sustainable levels"...
4 replies · active 774 weeks ago
Rage.

-Sent from my iPhone
Rage....or pragmatism? Once upon a time (a few months ago) this was stuff of tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists. Actions of the last few administrations and the current regime ranging from nafta to broken promises of "no nation building" to the "patriot (surveillance and detention) act" have made a strong case for former conspiracy theorists. Anyone who thnks there isn't a conspiracy working to destroy our way of life-I have one word for you: ACORN!!!! I think KMBR is just seeing things as they are.
I agree. It doesn't matter whether the Republicans or Democrats are in the majority since the end goal is the same-a one world government run either by the United Nations or a worse international body (if that is possible.) The game is which of those in both parties are going to gain the most wealth and power. And it is a game to them because human lives are merely either commodities, not worth saving, or to be used as "useful idiots" to realize this goal.
Lainie, you are right. I suggest reading the letters exchanged between Abe Lincoln and Karl Marx to see the true "Elephant" party, especially their shared goals. I realize Reagan changed aspects of the Republican Party, but the Republican "establishment" is every bit as if not more "progressive" than the Dems. Think about it...how much of what is happening now with our government was enabled by folks like Bush(41), Gingrich, Bush(43), and McCain! Now McCain supports closing borders, opposes cap and tax, and says TARP was a mistake. What happened to the McCain that ran for President? Remember also how both Bush Presidents broke every promise they campaigned on? "Read my lips: No new nation building...except for Iraq, Afganistan and the vast majority of Africa...oh and that New World Order thing too, eh....the American People are such DOPES". Let's face it, if the 2 or 3 RINOs that always seem to sell out on the crucial votes weren't there, 2 or 3 other McCains would be.
Bottom line: Toss all incumbents regardless of party affiliation!!!!!!!!!

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin