April 25, 2010

History Channel's "The Story of Us" and Irony






I watched the first episode of this great documentary series on the history channel tonight. It covered events leading up to the revolutionary war and it dovetails nicely with a couple of books I recently read. I find it very ironic that an otherwise entertaining and excellent series covering information that should be required material for every citizen of this country was introduced/prefaced by a man that apparently has little understanding of, or reverence for, the material itself. The series was introduced by none other than his one-ness, The pResident, chairman zero.

Secondly, does anyone else find it odd that a sitting president is endorsing a History channel documentary like Marlin Perkins hawking Mutual of Omaha insurance? What is next, selling an energy drink or some sportswear?

Maybe he should watch it instead of reading a TelePrompTer script of what one of his handlers thought a true blue USA loving American would say... You know what a good President would have actually felt and thought...

-Kook
via iPhone

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I went to DVR it tonight and saw that he was introducing it, so I changed my mind. Perhaps I should have recorded it and just skipped over the intro...
7 replies · active 773 weeks ago
It appears to be true to history so far

-Sent from my iPhone
You beat me to this one. I know history channel is run by liberals who have an agenda. Seeing Obama's mug in the intro brought out fears of massive revisionist history with all elements of religion edited out. So far it hasnt been THAT bad. Then again, it has just just started.
exactly my thoughts. The production values are great, and I think so far they have not really messed up

totally made it sound like Paul Revere did all the warning on the midnight ride...left out the other guy completely...oh well I cannot even remember the guy's name now.
Did you ever watch that DVD I sent you produced by History Channel and James Cameron?
I must admit I need to find that. It was on my bar. I will do that and watch it tonight. I really do want to watch it.

apologies
You owe me no apologies. You have been a good friend, a great blog co-host and are a fellow patriot. I understand that you don't have as much time as I do. I think you will enjoy that doc about the exodus because it approaches the story from a scientific view to prove that it is likely a valid story. As someone who values making a secular argument to debate secular atheists, and someone who liked the production value of the "story of us", you will enjoy that vid as well. They are of similar mold and equally well produced. Please do not apologize to me when you owe me none. I asked because I understand you are busy and given you liked the story of us, I know you will like the story about how the exodus really happened. It is really amazing from a secular viewpoint as well for me from a religious viewpoint in that science and religion don't clash.

Sent from my iPhone
Paul Mendolia's avatar

Paul Mendolia · 779 weeks ago

I found this show very inciteful. If I were the president I might be concerned about it. This series actually may have an effect on all of us in a good way. To me the comments that were made by some of the actors as well as professors, poloticians even surprised me. I have encouraged everyone on my FB page to watch it. Even in this short amount of time I began to feel so proud about how devoted our Patriots were. If the rest of the installments are as good as this one was I think a new wave of pride in America will rise up..I am just hoping that we don't have any revisionist history as part of it. It will encourage me to re-study American History - Something I did not do during High School.
1 reply · active 779 weeks ago
I am glad you find this story as inspiring as we do Paul. Warning: the more you learn the angrier you will become.

-Sent from my iPhone
I am wondering if this is "damage control" by the regime and they now see a growing disconnect between the gubment ad the people. The thing with history channel viewers is that they know real history and don't fall for revisionist garbage. The guy we are told is the 44th president is either doing danmage controfl trying fix damage done or had no idea that truthful history would be presented
2 replies · active 779 weeks ago
I think it is supreme arrogance and amateurism on his part to do that. As far as the history channel: difficult for them to say no.

-Sent from my iPhone
HC recently did several documentaries with Bush right before he left office. They were quite fair with Bush considering their political stance. HC is also pushing "save our history" which is against the blatant revisionist history that is so popular now. HC knows that their viewers know their stuff and will not accept revisionist history. Given the recent news stories lately that onimrod wants to recapture independents, a small non-policy speech at the beginning of such a documentary is not a suprise, nor will it have an impact. The polls show that the number who "disaprove" and "strongly disaprove are the same. It's a political given that once a voter goes to strongly disaprove, they are a lost cause.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin