April 29, 2010

Puerto Rico – A New State full of Potential Progressive Voters

51 States - One Step Closer to 57

Ok, here is the quick and dirty History of Puerto Rico.  Puerto Rico lies nestled right between Haiti/Dominican Republic and the British Virgin Islands.  It is in the same island chain as Cuba.  To get it in your mind right, Cuba is closest, then then Haiti/Dominican and then Puerto Rico.

 

image

Christopher Columbus landed on the island, which was inhabited by Amerindian Natives, in 1493 on his second voyage and claimed it for Spain.  Spain had it as a colony until the Spanish American war, in 1898 the United States invaded.  The US got Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba, the Philippines in the Treaty of Paris.  They began their relationship with the US as a territory governed my Martial Law, two years later moved to mostly self governed using systems virtually identical to a State’s, In 1917 all the inhabitants became citizens of the US, they began having popular elections of representatives and gained a US style Judicial system, Under Truman they got a regularly elected governor and other trappings of statehood including non voting representatives in DC, this had the effect of changing its’ status from Territory to Commonwealth or “Free Associated State”.  All of this was paving the way for a vote for statehood, currently three different plebiscites or votes have been taken by the people and all three have failed to win enough votes to make Puerto Rico our 51st state.

Why?

Well it probably has a lot to do with getting something for nothing.  To put it another way, why buy the cow when you get the milk for free?  They have all of the benefits of statehood, with fewer taxes. 

Enter The Zero Regime…

There is a bill up for vote today to support Puerto Rico’s right to self determination.  This is on the face of it, nonsense.  Puerto Rico already has that right and has expressed itself three times to remain as it is.  BUT, just like Yesterday’s post on Amnesty and Illegal Immigration, granting Puerto Rico Statehood would win many many Liberal Progressive voters.

You doubt it?

New Progressive Party The UN is heavily involved in the push for a change in Puerto Rico’s status.     From 1952 to 2007, Puerto Rico had three political parties which stood for three distinct future political scenarios. The Popular Democratic Party (PPD) seeks to maintain the island's "association" status as a commonwealth, and has won in referendums on the island's status held over six decades since coming under U.S. control.  The New Progressive Party (PNP) (catchy isn’t it?) seeks statehood. The Puerto Rican Independence Party seeks independence.

The real clincher on this one is this:  apparently in the bills that will follow this “nonbinding” vote today is a provision to allow people born in Puerto Rico but currently living in the continental US to vote on Puerto Rico’s status.  Read it again, a US citizen, born in Puerto Rico but currently living in, say, Illinois, will be able to vote in the self determination vote for Puerto Rico.

According to the latest estimates 70%  of Puerto Ricans cannot speak English passably, and many many of the recent immigrants TO Puerto Rico have been from Central America including Venezuela and Colombia and also from Cuba. 

Now ask yourself, in a Liberal House and Senate do you think, for an instant that if Nasty Pelotox and Dingy Harry and Chairman Zero thought that the people of Puerto Rico would:

a) Vote for statehood on their own without stacking the deck and;

b) vote in any way Conservative Republican or Libertarian after gaining statehood

They would a) stack the deck and b) want there to be a vote?

So here is what I think they are up to regarding Puerto Rico, it all seems to make some sense, They have this vote to affirm Puerto Rico’s right to Self Determination.  Puerto Rico already has a constitution, a popularly elected government, follows all federal regulations, and its’ populace are all citizens.

The Current Speaker of the House, President of the Senate,  and Governor are all members of this “New Progressive Party” (although actually claim to align themselves with Republicans, lending more credence to the crazy notion that Parties really do not matter), once this sham vote takes place in congress, they will call another referendum, although this time allow anyone born in Puerto Rico no matter where they reside (or actually probably no matter if they were born in Puerto Rico or not) to vote.  Then, because there are already delegates in Congress, they will immediately ask to be seated and BLAMMO we have a 51st state.  Then these so called republicans will decide they will caucus with the Liberals and Bingo, we are back to a filibuster proof super majority. 

Heck- they might just do it without resorting to a vote.  Congress votes in a nonbinding agreement that Puerto Rico has the right to self determination, and bang the delegates are seated as senators and representatives.  Sew another star on the flag boys and girls…

So take Amnesty for Illegals, throw in Puerto Rico, and what do you have…the re-election of the most rapidly unpopular president in history to a second term.

Puerto Rico: One Step Closer to 57.  next up, Guam, American Samoa, and the  US Virgin Islands …no really…click the link.

There is a bill pending Senate approval in the United States Congress that would authorize the United States Secretary of the Interior to extend technical assistance grants and other assistance to facilitate a political status public education program in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and American Samoa

ISNT THAT NICE?

Viva La Reconquesta! Arriba La Raza!

-KOOK

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Watch it become a welfare state immediately.
1 reply · active 778 weeks ago
IT ALREADY IS
They don't give a crap about Puerto Rico. This is really about getting the large Hispanic populations to vote for them so that they don't lose their rears in the midterms. They want to pit the Hispanics against the largely white tea party movement. This is race baiting plain and simple. I'd love to hear somebody tell me who "they" are.
2 replies · active 778 weeks ago
oh, agreed, but that is all part of the game they play.
As someone who knows and deals with Puerto Rican (PR abbreviated) people daily, all I have met are proud Americans. That being said, they have their own representative government at home. They have their own social values and tax structure. None that I know and have talked to about the subject of PR becoming a State supports the idea. Yes, I have brought it up on many occasions. They don't want our Federal government, tax structure etc. invading their private lives. They are smart enough to understand that our tax structure, added to theirs, would have no real benefit, and would collapse their economy. The Gubment is trying to get around this though open out and out voter fraud. They will let PR born citizens who live in America and can vote in their districts where they live vote for PR too. This has really pissed me off. If the Puerto Rican people who live and have vested interests in Puerto Rico want to vote for statehood, they can, at any time but if they move to Florida, they immediately get to vote in Florida. Voting in two states is voter fraud and this is the reason this bill can be defeated if people get this message.

My point in the last comment was that there are folks in both parties supporting this.
This stuff is getting exhausting. Really.
Yes it wears me out too, ladies.
Im sure it tired out folks like Washington, Adams, Jefferson etc. They had a tea party, which was followed by an event known as "the Boston massacre" where unhappy protestors of the King George daily outrage were killed. This happened when the local police force aka militia exchanged gunshots with regular British soldiers. Now history places those two events together, but there was time in between when the local population who was angry at King George faced increasingly hostile British soldiers. Tensions rose as neither side backed down until the Boston Massacre sparked the American Revolution.
So, what does that bit of history have to do with this post? Simple: This dangerous game of inciting various groups of people in this country from race to religion to political ideology has brought us to the point where we are a Boston Massacre away from a civil war, only this time it probably won't split along the Mason/Dixon line. Sorry folks, but I am getting quite close to the point where I don't see any other way out.
This can have complete unintented consequences for the dems if this happens. There's a good reason why they've rejected statehood, by my count, four times: they don't to pay the obscene high taxes that would come. They'll become a welfare state, but will pay a high price in taxes for it as well. I think PR would revolt and big time. Shoot, given this government obscene power grabs, I'm shocked they're not trying to get Mexico and the Philippines to join as well. That would round out the 57 states Obama wants not to mention adding over 200 million dem voters with two states that woulld make CA become politically irrelevent they have to be drooling over the idea. Won't happen because they, like PR don't want to pay the high taxes and looming debts of the US.
Can any reader here get me a list of all Florida Republican House members that voted for this? I can do something neat with it. It will make great blog material for later.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin