
A like minded cyber friend asked this question yesterday and I thought it was something we may have never asked ourselves and, yet, for such a simple question it is incredibly key. I do not think he did. I do not think he planned for them, anticipated them, understands them, gets them, knows how to react to them or has a plan to counteract them. Obama has never faced true conservative opposition before. It does not exist in Chicago. Other warring members of the corrupt Democrat machine? Sure, and he knows how to deal with them.
For a man with maybe slightly higher than average intellect and questionable psychological stability, does he have the stuff to face serious or principled opposition? How will he handle the presumptive scenario of sharing power with a tea party influenced senate or house? He came to power in a state with no real Republican presence, let alone a conservative or principled presence. Remember this is a guy who won his senate seat when his primary opponents were all disqualified for one reason or another.
He tells the story now of having gone door to door meeting the folks and getting his message out. Not so much. He was successful in challenging enough signatures on his opponents petitions to have them disqualified. Including the incumbent, Alice Palmer. Essentially he ran unopposed.
From what we have seen this far, this is not a man who makes compromises. Beyond the Alinksy inspired rhetoric and packaging there exists not much else. I doubt he ever imagined more than a small amount of polite hemming and hawing from the "extreme" right wing that he could easily marginalize and paint as voices from extremists.
His bag of tricks are like pebbles to the Kevlar® vest of the Tea Party Movement. In fact, they have begun to actually strengthen the movement as they are now proving to work against him. His silk tongued vocabulary and a narcissistic ability manipulate had always outwitted those around him in his circles of the politically correct vacuum of academia and in the snake pit of Chicago politics he was used as a tool by others more cunning and ambitious then he. He simply had to modify the shtick to the new circumstances. If one study his history you'll find that the pattern is essentially the same. All pomp, no circumstance.
He is utterly ill-equipped to hash out an effective strategy for the Tea Party Movement. It is why one day he is populist Obama, the next he is lashing out at Fox News, freezing spending and the next he is on vacation or not heard from for a few days. We have watched him richochet from thing to thing, searching for a strategy and hoping if he throws enough crap against the wall something will stick. With his limited patience and experience, he gives none of it enough time to see if it will work.
Watching his speeches in the last few days, his tone seems more erratic and certainly more paranoid. He keeps making references to unnamed "theys". "They'll say this, they'll say that about Obama". What is November going to look like if the mid-term results come out as unfavorably as they many predict?
It is interesting to note, there are precedents in history for this sort of unravelling. In the mid 1960s Soviet Union, after Khrushchev's policies eroded his popularity, he was put on a little "working vacation". Even in our own history, one have to only look back so far as the 1970s to reference a time when the Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, took on more and more responsibility as the Nixon lost power, sometimes actually omitting Nixon from policy meetings. It is also widely believe that Kissinger, raised the nation to DEFCON 3 without first getting President Nixon's approval, on the evening the Soviets threatened to send troops to the region. Hmmm, does a certain crusty black pants suit wearer know her history?
Realizing the situation is fluid and anything can change, he could prove me wrong and turn this thing around. However if we continue on the trajectory that we are on and the American people still reject Obama's cure all potion of Marxist medicine, all bets are off.
Clay · 792 weeks ago
kmbr · 792 weeks ago
janie · 792 weeks ago
KOOK 91p · 792 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
janie · 792 weeks ago
What I do know, is the race card has worn off. Liberals are starting to see him as more white than black, in the most general of terms. That's never a good thing. It's down to the level of simplicity right now. A slip up on his comments about gay marriage or the war in Afghanistan could get him now.
It's what the vultures are waiting for. But, I'm sensing with him? He's still got enough smarts not to screw it up. I'm sensing YOU know that too.
kmbr · 792 weeks ago
Right now, they're seeing their agenda in jeopardy with the global warming scam fall apart. Not only with Americans but also the third world and China are starting to recognize it for what it is..colonialism by a different name.
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
I do believe that the only thing preventing Obama from being more gaffe prone than Biden is the TOTUS. I don't believe obama earned a Constitutional law degree, as he has shown multiple times that he knows nothing about the Constitution. I think his whole education is a fraud and he is just good at reading off of teleprompters.
Christopher · 792 weeks ago
Carter,Bush 41,1994 congress,2006 congress and Obama himself.
Americans see mistakes and failures in government (albeit too late) and make the corrections at the ballot box. I agree with the post for the most part and see two major corrections coming this year and 2012.
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
janie · 792 weeks ago
And if he is a true liberal, he knows that doesn't mean anything. He doesn't really have to DO anything, but continue to speak against conservative values. The liberals really don't expect more than that. He's in there to keep "them" out.
Andrew33 · 792 weeks ago
To answer your question: "Did Obama ever imagine the Tea party movement?" Yes he did. Right after being elected, Obama claimed he wanted to raise an army of civillians. An army far more powerful than our military. Obama got just what he asked for. Armies are dangerous things, and historically have been known to turn on inept leaders and future generations will use the term Obama to describe ineptitude.
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
To answer your question: "Did Obama ever imagine the Tea party movement?" Yes he did. Right after being elected, Obama claimed he wanted to raise an army of volunteer civillians. An army far more powerful than our military. Obama got just what he asked for. Armies are dangerous things, and historically have been known to turn on inept leaders and future generations will use the term Obama to describe ineptitude.
kmbr · 792 weeks ago
And maybe the will to use it. They, mostly, have a knowledge of history and things worth living (and dying) for.
The left...not so much. But they are mentally unstable, most of them. That does work in their favor, I guess.
Fredd · 792 weeks ago
Sure, he's making dumb decisions, but he is definitely not dumb. A utopian, yes, a dummy, no.
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
samuel · 792 weeks ago
I've added you to my Blog list, can you do the same for me?
The Last Tradition
samuel · 792 weeks ago
I've added you to my Blog list, can you do the same for me?
The Last Tradition
Ron Russell · 792 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 792 weeks ago
A spending freeze of 200 Billion when you have run up a 20 trillion deficit before is not only a joke, but an insult to the American people and will be seen as such.