January 28, 2010

Of all the people in the world to piss off…

Obama picks the Supreme Court Judges.  While I am basically appalled and amazed that even he would go wagging his finger and scolding the Justices, I have a different take on it than anyone else I have seen so far this morning.
supreme_court_building

032007obama G’head tell ‘em off Big O, you don’t have to take that sh*t from them!  That’s right, you are the Big Man on Campus.  You tell em’ They better start making better decisions and by that you mean decisions you like!
(*humming as I type “you don’t tug on superman’s cape, you don’t spit into the wind…you don’t pull the mask off the ol’ lone ranger…”*)
Then maybe they will remember what they were all put there for, (well except that lackey Sotomayor) and they will begin showing you who’s got more cajones.dirtyharry
I mean in all the excitement I forgot myself, did I fire six shots or only five, I  dunno, but being this is the Supreme Court of the United States and and will blow your head clean off, you gotta ask yourself…do I feel lucky…well?  Do ya?  PUNK.
That’s right you tell them jive turkeys what’s what!
Healthcare – Unconstitutional
I mean who do they think they are?  You da Man!
Gun Laws - Unconstitutional
I mean they are lucky you even let them come to last night’s big telemprompter reading…
Roe v Wade – see ya
If you want their opinion, you will give it to them
Waterboarding – please that is fine for illegal enemy combatants captured in a war zone who aren't citizen’s of this country, signers of the Geneva conventions, or in uniform.
What do we need them for anyway…I think you should just abolish them, they are all old anyway, and you know what is best for us
Using the IRS as an attack dog – Not gonna happen…What IRS?
Hugo, Fidel, and Achmadinejad don’t have to go through this crap with courts and stuff, why should you?
Interstate Commerce Clause – Not what the framers mean; na uh…sorry charlie…
They need a good dressing down, why I can’t remember the last time anyone told them that they were all imbeciles…
The elastic Clause – not so elastic. 
Please oh Please…pimp slap em again big daddy, and put some smoke on it…!
Shhh nobody tell him there is a reason very few presidents or senators mess around with  SC Justices…
-Kook
Posted by KOOK on 1/28/2010



Labels: , , ,

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

I have been trying to explain to my mom, with whom I often debate, thar much of legislation passed since TR banned pot and opium, which he believed was unconstitutional under "persuit of happiness" and ownership rights of one's own body, unde the amendment that freed the slaves. However, churches which were some oh TRs biggest financial backers wanted such laws, and wanted them expanded to "demon rum" aka booze which was the most common problem, but with all things progressive, the camel needs to get his nose under the tent. I believe it was Wilson that got prohibition expanded to booze, but after a decade where black market booze led to open warfare between police and manufacturers, plus people going blind from bad liquer, prohibition of alcohol was lifted, but only on beer. Funny thing about making things illegal...it creates a black market for things, so people will make it, others who want to be rebellious will do or try whatever it is. So the drug war goes on, and sophisticated chemistry is leading to new substances, or stronger versions of things long forgotten. Jails were made in this country for crimes which was defined as hurting others. When we spread that rule to activities others disaprove of, eventually somebody will go to jail for reading his bible because it offends his neighbor. I stand by the original definition of crime that it is hurting others, and unless someone commits a crime, they should not go to jail. Overturning this constitutionally would have the same results as overturning Roe v Wade. Such things would be left to individual states and counties. To this day, in Tennessee, you have "dry counties" from prohibition where no alcohol is allowed, but folks who don't want to live that way are free to leave. Other counties have "blue laws" banning alcohol sales on Sundays. If Roe v Wade were overturned it would fall to states or counties or cities to pass whatever laws they choose. That's why we have states in the first place. I heard said yesterday this exact point put into proper context that the federal government didn't create states, states created the federal government. I believe all such things are states rights issues.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

I have been trying to explain to my mom, with whom I often debate, thar much of legislation passed since TR banned pot and opium, which he believed was unconstitutional under "persuit of happiness" and ownership rights of one's own body, unde the amendment that freed the slaves. However, churches which were some oh TRs biggest financial backers wanted such laws, and wanted them expanded to "demon rum" aka booze which was the most common problem, but with all things progressive, the camel needs to get his nose under the tent. I believe it was Wilson that got prohibition expanded to booze, but after a decade where black market booze led to open warfare between police and manufacturers, plus people going blind from bad liquer, prohibition of alcohol was lifted, but only on beer. Funny thing about making things illegal...it creates a black market for things, so people will make it, others who want to be rebellious will do or try whatever it is. So the drug war goes on, and sophisticated chemistry is leading to new substances, or stronger versions of things long forgotten. Jails were made in this country for crimes which was hurting others. When we spread that rule to activities others disaprove of, eventually somebody will go to jail for reading his bible because it offends his neighbor. I stand by the original definition of crime that it is hurting others, and unless someone commits a crime, they should not go to jail. Overturning this constitutionally would have the same results as overturning Roe v Wade. Such things would be left to individual states and counties. To this day, in Tennessee, you have "dry counties" from prohibition where no alcohol is allowed, but folks who don't want to live that way are free to leave. Other counties have "blue laws" banning alcohol sales on Sundays. If Roe v Wade were overturned it would fall to states or counties or cities to pass whatever laws they choose. That's why we have states in the first place. I head said yesterday this exact point put into proper context that the federal government didn't create states, states created the federal government. I believe all such things are states rights issues.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
KOOK's avatar - Go to profile

KOOK 91p · 791 weeks ago

Ronald Reagan said that bit about the states creating the Fed not the other way around.

There are still dry counties in AR as well.
1 reply · active 791 weeks ago
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

He got shot for trying to go after the fed. Bush was involved with those folks. That is why in the NH primary, Reagan said he'd never run with that s.o.b. Bush. After getting a phone call claiming that he would not have a dime of campaign funds if he didn't play ball, he changed his mind. He still vowed to take out the fed and related groups, which was the first thing he tried to do as president and mysteriously got shot. Oddly after surviving a gunshot wound that would have killed 99% of it's victims, the only campaign promise Reagan didn't keep was going after the Fed and ending the federal defecits. Tinfoil hat stuff right?
0 Vote up Vote down
Nickie Goomba's avatar - Go to profile

Nickie Goomba · 791 weeks ago

That SCOTUS attack was a direct slap at Justice Kennedy (Obama's swing vote on the Court). Smart move, Hussein.
1 reply · active 791 weeks ago
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

That may effectively end his Presidency, at least from a validity standpoint. That was dumber than going after the Chamber of Commerce. He has made an enemy of the entire supreme court.
0 Vote up Vote down
TC_Lady's avatar - Go to profile

TC_Lady · 791 weeks ago

And from what I hear, not only did he attack the Supreme Court, he was incorrect (lied) about what they did.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
deleted4448310's avatar - Go to profile

deleted4448310 77p · 791 weeks ago

After dismissing my conservative friends as alarmists, I am finally coming around: This man is dangerous.
1 reply · active 791 weeks ago
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

No, this man is the biggest hoax in history. The person or people pulling his strings are dangerous. obama is only an actor, playing president for tv. I now seriously he has much more than a high school education and simply has a good talent for reading a teleprompter. He just does what his puppeteers tell him to. He has no clue of the signifigance of protocol such as attacking a co-equal branch of government. He just does and says what he's told and probably knows little about the real political mood of the country or how much it matters.
0 Vote up Vote down
Snarky Basterd's avatar - Go to profile

Snarky Basterd · 791 weeks ago

I'm with you, KOOK. Keep pissing them off, and they'll side against you, SubZero.
0 Vote up Vote down
janie's avatar - Go to profile

janie · 791 weeks ago

I can't figure out if he's really intelligent and dangerous or just a stupid puppet.

A real intelligent, dangerous man might pretend that he is just a stupid puppet.
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
Andrew33's avatar - Go to profile

Andrew33 103p · 791 weeks ago

My hunch on why mr obama's handlers panties are in bind is because that campaign finance reform ruling impacts groups like ACORN who supported obama. That sounds like something to be looked into...I likely won't post much tomorrow, so if either of my co-bloggers want to look into this then fine, or I will do so but not tomorrow.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Widget by LinkWithin