January 14, 2010

A Somewhat Close to Anarcho-Capitalism Success Story


Ivorian tax-free rebel city flourishes

...Soroland may not be a breakaway zone, but for seven years the inhabitants of this zone have got used to living without government taxes, customs charges and even water and electricity bills...

I have to admit I have a growing curiosity about the ideas of anarcho-capitalism and it's feasibility. Perhaps it grows out of my growing discontent with the state, any state. The idea of anarchy used to bring me images of malcontented youths throwing rocks through Starbuck's windows. Typically, those are socialist anarchists and though they do constitute the largest block of anarchist thought, they do not own it.

As per Wikipedia anarcho-capitalism is defined as an individualist anarchist political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state and the elevation of the sovereign individual in a free market. In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other security services are provided by voluntarily-funded competitors such as private defense agencies rather than through compulsory taxation, and money is privately produced in an open market. Because personal and economic activities are regulated by the natural laws of the market through private law rather than through politics, victimless crimes, and crimes against the state are rendered moot.

My interest in AC began after learning more of Taoist thought in ancient China. The Taoists advocated pure freedom from the state, no interference by the state in economy or society. The Taosists were found by a contemporary of Confucius, Lao Tzu. Similarly to the Randian objectivist philosophy, Lao Tzu taught that it was the individual and his happiness was the integral component of a workable and healthy society. He had a healthy distrust of centralized governments and rightfully so as he lived in a time of turbulence, violence and abusive state power.

He was especially critical of the war making ability of the state. " "The people hunger because theft superiors consume an excess in taxation" and, "where armies have been stationed, thorns and brambles grow. After a great war, harsh years of famine are sure to follow."

His basic tenet is familiar to libertarians. Keep government simple and inactive. The antithesis to what we are witnessing in the United States and most of the world today.

It would certainly take a seismic shift in thinking, one perhaps brought about by calamity. Argentina shows a prime example of the state dissolving into anarchy. Areas of Mexico, the favelas in Brazil, many other countries are in the terminal phase of statism. Is it to idealistic to hope that in the face of government failures we will see more people running from government, instead of running to it for solutions? The example above, coming from Africa of all places, gives one a glimmer of hope.

h/t to Von Mises.org for mind broadening ideas!

Comments (9)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Anarcho-capitalism is no different than life here in America in the early British and French colonies. The center of government was 3000 miles away and populations were sparse. The local populations were largely self governing and the people were happy. The American Revolution was sparked by King George deciding that this should come to an end and the American colonists should repay England for the "French and Indian war. Our Founding documents such as the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Bill of Rights and Constitution tried to keep as much of those freedoms in place as possible. The system of government that we have now is a far cry from what the Founders intended. We are fast reaching the point where people are no longer believing that we are truly free. The 2010 elections will show our government and the world exactly that. I hope that the free breakaway state emerging from the Ivory Coast becomes a success story for other African Nations to follow.
5 replies · active 790 weeks ago
Oscar F. Mason's avatar

Oscar F. Mason · 790 weeks ago

I agree. I really wish we were still under the articles of confederation government. Think about it, we could still have slavery! Life without infrastructure would be truly blissful. I am dissapointed that FDR and Harry Truman expanded the federal government's powers, leading us to become a world superpower.
You have summoned YODA!!!!!! Read history you must. Study you need. Failed the articles did because too weak a government the articles made. Fell into anarchy America did because too weak articles were. So the constitution was made where slightly stronger but with power spread equally over 4 bodies equally we made. Now fail to educate young people we do. Lies we tell. FDR was still one with the force when dominated industrial output at the turn of the 20th century we did. Many lies you have been taught. Undo you must these falsehoods you believe.

If FDR peaked our power, how did W.Wilson lead America to supply and and then win WW1 which was bigger than Won? If you are serious, you need to really learn history
Uhh us becoming a superpower had absolutely zilch zero zot nada nein and nothing to do with FDR. It fa' damn sure didn't have a thing to do with Woodrow Wilson. Truman ? Ahh no.

You start witht the wrong premise entirely. Government and especially the president had nothing to do with the manufacturing and other industriized leaps the united states made. It was the entreprenurial(sp) spirit and capitalist system that made us the richest nation In The world.

To your other point the articles were too weak. That was their undoing. Theyrequired the states to actively Fu d the fed and the states did nit want to do that if left to their own devices. That is but one reason.

No what we need is to go back to the constitution

Waits tick... You mean articles of confederation as in the confederates in the war between the states... Don't you?

No no no. This is back in post revolutionary times. Think guys in white wigs...

The constitution of the confederate states was different.

-Sent from my iPhone
Yoda seems to think that this one is thinking pointy hats instead of white wigs
Me too

-Sent from my iPhone
I love mises.org and visit it daily. The logical end of libertarianism is anarchy, which advances the argument that most ills are merely a good thing taken too far. Individuals, private security... You just described Somalia, large swaths of Africa and the Pashtun belt. In a perfect world it might work. In reality, we need a benevolent Leviathan or life becomes nasty, brutish and short.

This is why I don't call myself a libertarian. I am not "pure" enough. Good thought piece though!
2 replies · active 793 weeks ago
I like calling myself a constitutional libertarian.

-Sent from my iPhone
We all fall under what I call "pro-liberty" supporters as compared to "anti-liberty" progressives or communists. I too don't make the leap of calling myself a "libertarian" but I am closer to libertarian idealism than any other modern American political philosophy. I am an Independent and base my views on right and wrong, rather than "right and left." I like the term "Constitutionalist" and I think "Constitutional Libertarian" fits most of us well. My parents who used to despise "libertarians" were shocked to see where they fall on the "Nolan Chart." I believe that most Republicans, when they vote for Republicans really want true Libertarianism.

The difference between what is happening in the Ivory Coast (I want to say on, as in on the coast or beach but Ivory Coast is a country) is the lack of Muslim Fundamentalism and tribal civil war. The areas such as Somalia, and the Pashtun Belt have tribal warfare and are havens of Islamic Fundamentalists. What is happening in the free zone of the Ivory Coast is self governance, that is promoting opportunity. After this country was founded, our Senators and Congressmen as well as Judges and Police had other jobs to support themselves. A Senator did not get 200K a year plus free health care for life as a pension. Being a part of state or federal government was much closer to a volunteer job than today. What is happening in the Ivory Coast, while not Constitutionally framed has much more in common with the America our founders set up than either Somalia or today's United States.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin