January 12, 2010

If you Give a Mouse a Cookie…

mouse_325 Why is it so difficult for people, who admit to seeing what the goons in the District of Criminals are doing, to believe that those in DC will do MORE?  The answer is twofold, on one hand people Project their desires onto politicians and demand their pet cause be addressed, on the other hand when no limits are set and different voices call for different things and those in power get away with whatever they try then they begin to feel there are  no limits; indeed functionally there aren’t any.

First let us understand that once the District of Criminals is given the power to do one thing, they will do more.  Allow them to tax your property; soon they will tax your income. Allow them to tax your income; soon they will tax your benefits.  Allow them to provide your healthcare; they will feel compelled to control unhealthy things. Allow them to control the “unhealthy things” and soon everything will be declared “unhealthy”.

More, more, more, more, more, more, more.rat_2

They forget to declare a nanny or a gardener’s wages; and we do nothing.  So they or the next guy forgets he has a house in the Bahamas or in Ireland; and we do nothing. So then the other guy forgets to pay his taxes that he was reimbursed for anyway; and he gets promoted.  So then they up the ante again, and again, and again.  No limit.

A man associates with terrorists, thugs, and thieves, and we turn a blind eye; so why wouldn’t he think it was Ok to appoint some of those associates to positions in his administration?  He says that we are “five days away from fundamentally transforming this Nation” and we do nothing; then why would he not then think it was fine to go ahead and do that?  People didn’t listen and didn’t hear what he said, they heard what they wanted him to say.  They projected their and desires and beliefs onto him…

Once a person realizes that they have no limits placed on what they can do, it fans the flames on their desires and dreams. Once a person has demonstrated that they have no limits in area A; we must realize that they also have no limits in Area B.

Hypothetically let’s say I am an advocate of Gun Control.  I think all guns should be banned.  Once the government enacts that ban, why should I think they would not attempt to control something else?  The next person advocates for stricter drug laws, and so on and so on. That is to say, once we allow the government to control one thing; they will naturally think it is ok to control another thing.  I do not advocate anarchy; but we must take special care and be more vigilant, realizing that when we give government the power to control one thing we as individuals think is good, someone else also has pet causes and issues that we may not share. The resultant message that a politician gets is that the people as a whole want him to control many many things…and there are no limits.

Here is the human failure that allowed BHO and his merry band of radical criminals in control of this nation:

XmascandycanePeople want to project their values on likeable or public figures.  BHO said some nonsensical fluff but people HEARD what they wanted to hear.  BHO and Botoxi and Dingy Harry have demonstrated no limits to what they will attempt, because the people have not enforced any.  Yet, people project their own values onto them.  They say “surely they wouldn’t do that”, when nothing that these goons have done would logically lead us to believe that they indeed would not do that; quite the opposite, we have seen no evidence that they would limit themselves in any way.  But  we have consciences and limits and  we  would not dream of such illicit, unethical, or amoral behavior, so  we  project our values on people who have no such constraints, and indeed have not been taught those constraints by any experience they have had with we the people

  If you give a mouse a cookie, he is going to want a glass of milk.  If you get him a glass of milk, he will want a straw, and if you give him a straw he will want a napkin to wipe his mouth.  If you give him a napkin to wipe his mouth; he will want a mirror…

My pet cause and my desire is for government to get out of my life, and to how-to-draw-jerry-the-mouse-from-tom-and-jerry-tutorial-drawing_copyleave me alone. Many people may say this, but the difference between me and a lot of people is not only do I want them out of MY life I want them out of your life as well; many people want them in your life, but out of theirs

-KOOK

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
The progressives started this with "prohibition" of Marijuana and catalogue medicines such as Coca-Cola which had cocaine and such things. T.R. pushed this agenda, knowing that it was likely to be unsuccessful because of the Constitution. At the time, Marijuana was popular with Mexicans in the southwest U.S. and usage elsewhere was negligible. With conservative Churches as an ally, T.R. got this agenda through touting such things as a threat to the "moral fabric" of the country. The problem is, those churches did not practice what they preach. They say to treat others as you would have them treat you, yet when those others were doing something that had no impact on the rest of America, they needed to be jailed. Well, now the genie is out of the bottle, and that same government that was putting those people over there in jail for doing that could very easily be putting Christians in jail for practicing their religion, such as teaching that homosexuality is wrong. That is a "hate crime" now. So by pushing prohibition (which by definition is a restriction on an activity) stories about Marijuana, a little known intoxicant used by a tiny segment of the population, spread to the rest of the country leading to an explosion of usage AFTER it was banned. When such things are banned, a black market for such things forms instantly. The mafia grew out of just such black markets when Alcohol was next on the list. Now pandoras box is open and powerful drugs such as methamphetamine and crack cocaine which turn people into addicts nearly instantly have taken the place of marijuana, which is the #1 cash crop in America and prohibition is about to spread into areas such as what foods you eat and how much you drive. Yet the elites will bypass those rules they put on everyone else, just as those who passed alcohol prohibition were able to have an occasional imported drink. So, has prohibition worked, has it helped the country by having it's desired effect? The answer, of course is no and the reason for that is that the Government cannot stop people from doing something if they really want to do so. Yet, we have the same thing now as we did a century ago. People want the government to tell everybody how much calories our burger should have or whether you can smoke a cigarette, but when it comes to obeying similar laws especially where marijuana is concerned, those people will be the first to break them. I am not advocating the use or legality of drugs such as pot. I believe it should be a states' rights issue. I believe voters in each state should decide where they stand on such things through representation or referendum, and actually I would vote against legalization here while I support the right of others to vote differently elsewhere. If Roe v Wade was overturned, the same thing would happen as it would become a states' rights issue and then each state could choose it's own path there too. So I am, if nothing else, consistent in how I believe our government should work. So my question is, in a decade, will I be getting a nice greasy steak and a case of non diet caffeine loaded soda from a grocery store, or the dope man?
Extremely good points. This really should be part two of what I just wrote. Title it if you give a rat a regulation.
2 replies · active 794 weeks ago
Since I posted today, and yours is up, I will use it as tomorrows post and do exactly that. Did you get my e-mail?

You could just add it to your post, too, but then it would probably be too long. If I make it a post now, the posts from earlier today won't get as much attention. I don't want to "bury" them by doing too many at once. I have noticed that any more than 3 and the bottom ones aren't noticed as much. I will do a "viral of the day" at night before bed and 1 post during the day and that's all, leaving room for you and KMBR. We all do long posts so any more than that and it is overkill.
yes I would really like to master the ability to make teaser posts with the click to read more links
This is brilliant, I love it, carried at LCR
Wonderful Post! The rat parade has been set loose to scour the streets for loot and all the loot they can possibly find. The stinky rat will hunt all the loot until an exterminator stops these stinky, disgusting rats. Hopefully, the exterminator stops these evil rats soon.
1 reply · active 794 weeks ago
Yes ma'am we need some D-Con real bad around the District of Criminals...
Great post!! (And future post!!)
1 reply · active 794 weeks ago
Thanks SNK come back and read the follow up tomorrow, I am sure AD33 will do a great job.
Great post!

The statist march, which begin in earnest under Teddy Roosevelt, has been by and large increasing at various rates every since. Arguably the guiltiest of the guilty are FDR, LBJ, GWB, and now we have the grand daddy of them all, BHO.

I, like you, want the government out of my life and yours as well.
2 replies · active 794 weeks ago
Thanks for the kind words, as well as wishing the government out of both of our lives.

-Sent from my iPhone
I look at the 20th century as the century of American "progressivism" which was a failed experiment. Our current economic failure is proof that we must permanently end this flirtation with "compassionate fascism" as history shows that such forms of government rarely remain peaceful and imagine the threat to the world if we became a Weimar type state. As far as where American Progressivism originated, I have been reading about how Karl Marx had a direct influence on the formation of the Republican Party, out of the death of the old "Whig" party. It's really interesting. Really, the foundation for the American progressive movement was the post civil war Republicans who did so within the backdrop of "reconstruction". This is changing my view that TR was the first American progressive.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin