October 16, 2009

Profiles in Communist Tyranny: Pol Pot.

File:Pol Pot2.jpgOnce again, here I am defending why the people and the places I hold dear are virtuous and once again, here I am attempting to shine a light on the things that go bump in the night.  Didn’t we fight in two big wars, and a couple smaller ones, and spend a decade proving that the theory of Social-Commune- ism is a recipe for failure.  Did we not prove the superiority of the Capitalist system?   I know many of us watch Glenn Beck, all of us real whackos do anyway, so I won’t start with Mao.  I will start with someone equally as crazy, and just as idealistic as any other third rate CommisSocialist dictator.  I doubt many people know any more about him than most would know about good ol Chairman Mao.  But Pol Pot was a great visionary thinker of socialist theory Just like Mao, check it out:Socialism Crusades, Socialist Crusaders, Occult socialism

Saloth Sar, aka  "brother number one" or most commonly in the west, Pol Pot, from Politique potentielle, was the leader of the Cambodian communist movement known as the Khmer Rouge and was Prime Minister of Democratic Kampuchea (Cambodia) he became the de facto leader of Cambodia in mid-1975. During his time in power, Pol Pot imposed a version of agrarian collectivization, forcing (nearly all) city dwellers to relocate to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labor projects toward a goal of "restarting civilization" in a "Year Zero" state. Property became collective, and education was dispensed at communal schools. Children were raised on a communal basis. Even meals were prepared and eaten communally. Pol Pot's regime was extremely paranoid. Political dissent and opposition were not permitted. People were treated as opponents based on their appearance or background. The combined effects of slave labor, malnutrition, poor medical care, and executions resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1.7 to 2.5 million people, approximately 21% of the Cambodian population.

He studied radio electronics at the EFR in Paris from 1949 to 1953. As a result of failing his exams in three successive years, he was forced to return to Cambodia in January 1954. Historian Philip Short has said that Saloth's poor academic record was a considerable advantage within the anti-intellectual PCF, who saw uneducated peasants as the true proletariat and helped him to quickly establish a leadership role for himself among the Cercle Marxiste (Marxist Circle).

By the summer of 1968, Saloth began the transition from a party leader working with a collective leadership into the absolutist leader of the Khmer Rouge See full size imagemovement. Where before he had shared communal quarters with other leaders, he now had his own compound with a personal staff and a troop of guards. Outsiders were no longer allowed to approach him. Rather, people were summoned into his presence by his staff.

After a central committee meeting in May 1972, the party under the direction of Saloth began to enforce new levels of discipline and conformity.  These policies, such as forbidding minorities from wearing jewelry, were soon extended to the whole population. A haphazard version of land reform was undertaken by Saloth. Its basis was that all land holdings should be of uniform size [equality]. The party also confiscated all private means of transportation at this time [I don’t want to be CEO of a car company]. The 1972 policies were aimed at reducing the peoples of the liberated areas to a sort of feudal peasant equality. These policies were generally favorable at the time to poor peasants and extremely unfavorable to refugees from towns who had fled to the countryside.

In 1973 he decreed the process of reorganizing peasant villages into cooperatives and individual possessions were banned. Anyone with an education was singled out in the purges and killed. A set of new prisons was also constructed in Khmer Rouge run areas. When the Khmer Rouge took the town of Kratie in 1971, Saloth and other members of the party were shocked at how fast the liberated urban areas shook off socialism and went back to the old ways (capitalism). Various ideas were tried to re-create the town in the image of the party, but nothing worked. In 1973, out of total frustration, Saloth decided that the only solution was to send the entire population of the town to the fields in the countryside. He wrote at the time "if the result of so many sacrifices was that the capitalists remain in control, what was the point of the revolution?". Shortly after, Saloth ordered the evacuation of the 15,000 people of Kompong Cham for the same reasons. Internationally, Saloth and the Khmer Rouge were able to gain the recognition of 63 countries as the true government of Cambodia and they were given a seat at the United Nations. In September 1974, Saloth decreed that money would cease to be put into circulation and quickly be phased out.

In Beijing in 1975 Saloth's "death list" of enemies to be killed was publicized.   The list, which originally contained seven names, quickly expanded to include all the senior government leaders along with the military and police leadership. The Khmer Rouge took Phnom Penh on April 17, 1975. The country’s name was officially changed to "Democratic Kampuchea". Outsiders were targeted and Buddhists, Muslims, Western-educated intellectuals people who had contact with Western countries or with Vietnam, disabled people, and foreigners were either exiled, killed, or  put in the S-21 camp for interrogation involving torture in cases where a confession was useful to the government. Confessions forced at S-21 were extracted from prisoners through such methods as raising prisoners by their arms tied behind and dislocating shoulders, removing toenails with pliers, suffocating a prisoner repeatedly, and skinning a person while alive.

Pol Pot adopted the Maoist [there’s that loveable little rascal again] idea that peasants were the true working class. In 1976, people were reclassified as full-rights (base) people, candidates and “new people” - so called because they included most of the people who had been forced from the cities into the communes. Depositees were marked for destruction. Their rations were reduced to two bowls of rice or soup per day, which led to widespread starvation.  The state-controlled radio proclaimed that only one or two million people were needed to build the new communist utopia. As for the others, as they put it, "To keep you is no benefit, to destroy you is no loss."

Hundreds of thousands of the refugees from the cities  were taken out in shackles to dig their own mass graves. Then the Khmer Rouge soldiers would beat them to death with iron bars and hoes or buried them alive. A Khmer Rouge directive ordered, "Bullets are not to be wasted." These mass graves are often referred to as The Killing Fields. Pol Pot died sometime in 1998, and gradually the Country changed direction.

…Class warfare, destruction of capitalism, state control of industry, hmmmm.  By the way…now Cambodia is a Constitutional Monarchy and parliamentary representative democracy …  huh…

Wow after reading that I can certainly see why so many in OUR government really look up to the Marxists.  Their track record of successfully running governments is so fantastic, and they love the poor people too!

-Kook

* no you nutcases, or the foIks at the DOJ, I am not saying Obama is going to round us up and kill us, or that he wants to, or that he would, I am just saying this is Communism.  Many of our presidents advisors and pals like communists such as Mao.  This guy was also a follower of Mao.  That is all I am saying.  This is what loving and following Communist policies has always led to.  Everywhere.

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
KOOK, That was an excellent article!! It was very informative. I honestly didn't know much about Pol Pot. And, these libs like these communist, or Marxist Killers. How creepy. Capitalism is proven to work. Yes, the market has its ups and downs, but thats normal. Communism causes whole economies to collapse. Communism invites starvation, and countrywide abuses of the people, and abuse of power by leaders. I really think its quite sick and don't understand why any person would want to follow communism.
As to why a person would want to follow communism, it's simple: something for nothing. What they don't know and won't learn til it's too late is that they're the ones that will suffer the most as they're promised a chicken in every pot and end up lucky if they get a bowl of rotten rice. These nut jobs always believe in the utopia even though they can't come up with one example and I would dare them to come up with one without at least a million deaths. They claim it hasn't been given enough chances or the right people haven't been put in charge. The truth is it's a proven failure and there are no right people. Good luck convicing them though.

As for Pol Pot, I knew he studied in France, though I thought it was electrical engineering and his failure was why he hated intelligent people, even to the point that he would execute anyone wearing glasses and his mass murder, but this force relocation and slave labor was somthing I didn't know. At least not to the level as explained here.
1 reply · active 806 weeks ago
Good post and comments. Kook did a good history lesson and I love reading history. I didn't comment because there was not anything of significance that I could add. Has anyone besides me noticed that the leaders of Communism have often been well educated, middle class types? The reason why people still fall for communism is that they don't read their history. There is one fundamental difference between Americans and other areas where communism has flourished. That difference that we have a history free of dictatorship or an all powerful religion like Islam or Catholicism. I have nothing personal against either one, but in both, the religious hierarchy acts as a governing body over all its followers. Communism has flourished in areas where Kingdoms formerly existed or a powerful religious body was the real government. Now I'm sure I have angered a catholic or two but look honestly at the Vatican. It is it's own state, and when the Pope gives a decree the Catholic Churches march in lock step. As I said, I have nothing against Catholics and most everyone I know here is because of the Hispanic population. We are all free to worship as we please.(for now) I will support my statement by asking: which Christian denomination supports left leaning Dems the most?
Thank you for this post. Knowledge is power and the truth about communism must never be forgotten. As a survivor I will never stop telling my story. Great Job-you are a great American!!!
1 reply · active 800 weeks ago
Your comment means so much to me coming from a survivor of a tyrannical regime. Thank you. And if you would like to tell your story let me know and I will post it on here.

-Sent from my iPhone
Communism doesn't invite starvation. People with their twisted and warped perceptions and their own ideals invite starvation. I don't support communism... in whole I don't support any government because I can't think of any Western government that hasn't committed some sort of atrocity in the last 100 years.

People, not ideals kill people. Disillusioned individuals create genocidal environments. What does absolute power do? Pol Pot was quite under-educated and really needed a reality check. Un-educated rural people are not the future.

Enlightenment and education is key to creating a society of human empathy and understanding.

Imo the American government is encouraging ignorance and taking funding from education and putting it into mass media and entertaining the masses. Keep the mob happy and distracted and you can take away their liberties and freedoms and they will thank you for it.
1 reply · active 786 weeks ago
I disagree, show me the communist utopia... Show me a single communist state that has operated at even close to our efficiency or developed our standard of living. Communism leads to tyranny period.

What atrocities has the USA committed in the last century?

-Sent from my iPhone
You realize that Nazi Germany was a Fascist (i.e. the opposite of Communist) regime, right?
1 reply · active 529 weeks ago
I challenge you to prove that. And don't give the sheeple answer of "Duh...Communism is "left wing" and fascism is "right wing", dude". Do you realize that the Zi in Nazi is an abbreviation for the German word for SOCIALISM? Is socialism a right wing concept? Hitler killed 6 million Jews in concentration camps. Stalin only killed 9 million in his "gulags". Hitler's national socialism took away all property rights and had no regard for human rights. Under Communism, all property rights non-existent and the government decides every aspect of your life from
what you do for work, how you live and what you eat, to when you die. The only difference between Communism and Fascism is who hold the freaking gun to your head which by the way is of NO value in either communism or fascism so explain why KOOK was wrong here, or learn something for yourself instead of getting your education from doing bong hits.
there's a difference between socialism and communism you know.. nazi germany started calling themselves socialists, to become popular, but they really weren't, and china is one of the most capitalist countries in the world.. scandinavian countries have had socialist governments for a long time, and we're doing fine. So stop whining idiots.
1 reply · active 693 weeks ago
You are correct. There is a difference between communism and socialism. It is comparable to 2 people who just jumped out of a plane with no parachutes. Communism is the one who hit the ground. Socialism is the one still falling. You are really one to talk. You did well while we protected you from your Marxist neighbors.
You can't even afford your own national defense. We have bankrupted ourselves paying for that. On top of that, one douchebag with a gun gets loose in your town and hundreds die because you don't believe in defending yourselves. Your monetary house of cards is collapsing around you, proving that whole notion of governments manipulating economies as though they are tuning up a car was the most arrogant, pompous ideology of the last 200 years.

Sure, the Chinese are "more capitalistic", who cares that they are about to suffer the same tragedy of the commons that you have brought on yourselves.

Why do you care that we don't want our country to beome a dumpster diving welfare state like yours? This message wasn't aimed at you, but since you opened your mouth to trash us, why don't you take a little time to thank us for paying for the Internet you are using.

On top of that, let me remind you that you don't have free speech. You are so ready to bow down to any master that comes along, that now you get tossed in jail for something as stupid as criticizing Allah and you want to tell us about how you live in freedom? LMAO!!!

If all you are going to do is spout off 8th grade opinions, stick them where the Swedish meatballs come out. Otherwise, bring some facts, jack...or Fred...

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin