July 20, 2010

Rachel Maddow “Paying” for Tax Cuts

Tonight on The  Rachel Maddow Show[to Ezra Klein]:

“On the issue of deficits do-does the base, either,  as articulated, through the tea party movement, or not, care enough about deficits that proposals like Marco Rubio’s, like all of these other, er ah um ah, candidates who are proposing BIG TAX CUTS WITHOUTH PAYING FOR THEM…”

[insert furious profanity filled arm flailing rage here] WTF?! Paying for what….So, the government could not possibly function with out all of the current taxes we have levied against us as of right now? We would run up the deficit if we didn’t pay for a tax cut….a “paid for” tax cut is NOT AN EFFIN’ TAX CUT!!! It is a….what in good gravy’s name would you call that?!?  It’s a shift, a tax shift from one group or business to another.  To “cut” implies some sort of removal, not exchange.  An exchange would result in no real cut at all.

This is some sort of “Freudian Admission”,(I think I made up a new phrase) where people who are incredibly ignorant of reality say something that to them is non-controversial and perfectly logical which spins rational knowledgeable logical humans off in apoplectic fits of slack jawed rage.  They do this all the time.

For a person who has a freaking PhD in Political Science this is utter willfull denial of all rational political reality, as proven by history.  Raising taxes while simultaneously increasing spending, no matter what group you shift the weight of the tax burden to, will a) LOWER actual revenue, and b) increase the deficit.

No, Maddow, and all her cohorts,  are in complete denial of the Laffer Curve,  and History. 

According to their theory of how the world works, you can NEVER reduce government spending, unless it is on the Military, and you can NEVER actually lower the effective tax rate across the board, and yet they somehow think that by raising taxes and raising spending we can lower the deficit.  Which of course, you know, you could, if you could remove human nature and incentive from the equation.laffer curve

But here in the real world the only way to reduce the deficit is to simultaneously reduce SPENDING and raise Revenue…which history has proven to be accomplished by lowering the tax rate below the tipping point as illustrated by the Laffer Curve.  It seems to me that the T.E.A party movement is all about tax and spending cuts.  Cut Spending and Cut Taxes, or you know, Reaganomics.

Well, I got that out of my system,

C.L.

I guess I should add a post script to explain who this mystery guest blogger is: I am the cousin of the KOOK

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Great explanation! I get so tired of arguing this point with the libs in Left Blogistan...
It's like arguing with a five year old. I just try reaching out to those still on the fence.
Thanks guys, I try to get her to write more things, because the points she makes when we are talking are very valid, she is just reluctant to write for some reason. She watches Maddow for the same reason I occasionally do...to justify our anger at the moonbats.__
1 reply · active 767 weeks ago
If all you watch or listen to are the voices on your side, how do you know you are right? Unlike most readers here, I have met C.L. In a time when I thought our next generation had been reduced to mindless MTV watching morons, CL demonstrated that such is not the case. I watch as much programming of the opposition as I do those who "support" our side and recommend everyone does.

By the way, Hi, C
It doesn't matter the evidence the left will never agree that raising taxes results in less revenue.

Why? we can only guess. Those in power, just want more money and power to work with. Those who follow them, revel in the idea of making everyone as miserable as they are. I'll never be convinced of anything else.

KOOKs cousin? There are more KOOKs out there? LOL. I didn't mean to bump your post.
Admittedly, Bush allowed Dems to manipulate his his tax cuts so that they both would not be paid for, and would expire. Getting into 2 wars before the tax cuts impacted the economy was also not wise. One area where I differ with many of my friends here is that I believe spending cuts do more to stimulate the economy than tax cuts. Recall 1996, when Bill Clinton took on and basically shut down the Federal Government to get meager tax hikes into Newt's spending cuts? As I recall the economy did quite well after that, despite the tax hikes. I think we all agree that tax cuts combined with spending cuts are the answer, but dancing winged pink elephants are the most likely solution we will see.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin