First, it is important to point out that American ideals are the embodiment of merit based achievement. That is not to say we have not strayed far from that ideal. The American dream is a story based on merit. The idea that anyone, regardless of class, can rise to unlimited levels. To say that we have strayed from those ideals is also not to say that they are dead. They are very much alive but the understanding and appreciation of such a concept shrinks daily.
It is why Sarah Palin resonates with so many Americans. It is also why, though under false pretenses, the story line of Barack Obama resonated. Our current list of who's who is replete with examples of meritocracy, ranging from political figures, to sports figures to software moguls. The limits, as it goes, are only caused by your ability, intellect, ambition, belief in self, spirit or some combination of them. This is unique in human history where class structures were regularly fixed and individuality was scorned.
However, we need only to look to contemporary societies to see how collectivism is the antithesis to merit based achievement. In a collectivist society, the highest ideal is agreement with the system and whoever is holding the reins of power at any given time. The survivors and achievers are the chameleons as they were called in Mao's China. Patronage is rife and success, whether individual or at the corporate level, is more or less ensured by never questioning the party line and following it to the letter.
What are the casualties in such a system? Obviously the truth becomes distorted and twisted. A perfect example of this would be the state of our scientific community and the global warming hoax. Careers and reputations have been destroyed. Mediocrity and dishonesty have proven to be invaluable traits for professional survival. Again, no where was this illustrated better than in Mao's China. The favored patrons of the party were the mind numbed robots, those unable to independently think and devoid of conscience but able to maintain the party's ever changing position in the turbulent campaigns. The result was an undeniable change in the value system of the Chinese society.
We see this group think mentality in our own shackled by political correctness society. Young adults, who obviously grew up in very amoral, peer-dominated environments are ripe for such systems. Many parents feel absolutely unable to set down any moral or ethical guidelines for their kids. Of course, this may be because they have none themselves but also because they have been seeped in moral relativism. Often times, they too hold confusion on such issues. Many of them have turned their child rearing over to the “pack. It is no wonder so many of these kids live in a sort of Lord of the Flies world and scorn traditional American values.
Individuality, personal freedom and truth. These are the costs of collectivism. Coincidentally, they are three important features that differentiate the American spirt from the rest of the world.
December 16, 2009
Comments (10)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Climbing the Collectivist Ladder
2009-12-16T04:54:00-06:00
kmbr
Conservative Ideology|Kmbr's Musings|Liberal Ideology|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Andrew33 103p · 798 weeks ago
The point I am making here is that if there is an environment that encourages and supports success, successful people will come from that environment. at the same time, if there is an environment that stifles success, huge amounts of human potential can go to waste. America has an environment that has given more opportunity for success to the common man in the last 2 centuries than any nation in history. Now we have a bunch of politicians who want to take that away because of their own greed. That environment that has allowed and nurtured success is what has made America great, and now we are flirting with the slippery slope of throwing it all away.
deleted4448310 77p · 798 weeks ago
We should be particularly on guard when out collectivist progressives invoke Jesus Christ when talking about health care, immigration, etc.
As Senator Coburn says, it's not charity if you're doing it with confiscated money.
kmbr · 798 weeks ago
It is the very reason that the Chinese today, even with the intellectual manpower they have, can not do much but copy technology.
Andrew33 103p · 798 weeks ago
Snarky Basterd · 798 weeks ago
These are also the traits of most people who succeed in corporate America. (Trust me, I live it every day.) It's a problem rife among our leadership, and not likely, unfortunately, to change any time soon.
Nice to see you posting here, kmbr.
KOOK 91p · 798 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 798 weeks ago
KOOK 91p · 798 weeks ago
-Sent from my iPhone
Andrew33 103p · 798 weeks ago
madmath1 · 797 weeks ago
As for those that think Jesus would be a socalist liberal haven't read the book of John very well. When he was in (gosh I can't spell those names) Gallilee, a crowd was so awed and inspired by his miracles that they were going to proclaim him King. He fled when he saw this. If human government is the pinancle of excellence, then why didn't he accepted his ordination. He rejected it because he rejects human government as being the source of enpowerment and enrichment of the people.