December 16, 2009

Climbing the Collectivist Ladder


First, it is important to point out that American ideals are the embodiment of merit based achievement. That is not to say we have not strayed far from that ideal. The American dream is a story based on merit. The idea that anyone, regardless of class, can rise to unlimited levels. To say that we have strayed from those ideals is also not to say that they are dead. They are very much alive but the understanding and appreciation of such a concept shrinks daily.

It is why Sarah Palin resonates with so many Americans. It is also why, though under false pretenses, the story line of Barack Obama resonated. Our current list of who's who is replete with examples of meritocracy, ranging from political figures, to sports figures to software moguls. The limits, as it goes, are only caused by your ability, intellect, ambition, belief in self, spirit or some combination of them. This is unique in human history where class structures were regularly fixed and individuality was scorned.

However, we need only to look to contemporary societies to see how collectivism is the antithesis to merit based achievement. In a collectivist society, the highest ideal is agreement with the system and whoever is holding the reins of power at any given time. The survivors and achievers are the chameleons as they were called in Mao's China. Patronage is rife and success, whether individual or at the corporate level, is more or less ensured by never questioning the party line and following it to the letter.

What are the casualties in such a system? Obviously the truth becomes distorted and twisted. A perfect example of this would be the state of our scientific community and the global warming hoax. Careers and reputations have been destroyed. Mediocrity and dishonesty have proven to be invaluable traits for professional survival. Again, no where was this illustrated better than in Mao's China. The favored patrons of the party were the mind numbed robots, those unable to independently think and devoid of conscience but able to maintain the party's ever changing position in the turbulent campaigns. The result was an undeniable change in the value system of the Chinese society.

We see this group think mentality in our own shackled by political correctness society. Young adults, who obviously grew up in very amoral, peer-dominated environments are ripe for such systems. Many parents feel absolutely unable to set down any moral or ethical guidelines for their kids. Of course, this may be because they have none themselves but also because they have been seeped in moral relativism. Often times, they too hold confusion on such issues. Many of them have turned their child rearing over to the “pack. It is no wonder so many of these kids live in a sort of Lord of the Flies world and scorn traditional American values.

Individuality, personal freedom and truth. These are the costs of collectivism. Coincidentally, they are three important features that differentiate the American spirt from the rest of the world.

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
This is absolutely right. One area where you can still see results driven achievement is in sports. If the teachers unions and hard core communists of the world had their way, there would be "affirmative action" in sports such as (American) football and Nascar. There has already been some of that nonsense at the coaching level in college and pro football, but those sports are results driven exclusively and some attempts to hire minority coaches (such as Notre Dame) have resulted in the collapse of their football program. However, there are a growing number of minority coaches who have achieved their position on merit , but they had to go through the process just like all others before them of learning how to do the job before they got the job. Randy Shannon, head coach at the University of Miami who have been very successful at rebuilding the football program to a 9-3 season and strong recruiting as well as doing so with character and class. The Football program once known as "Thug U" has only had one player arrested since Shannon's tenure as head coach which is amazing for any college football program, especially for UM. Nascar is much the same. Nascar has a program encouraging youngsters who show natural talent who don't fit the usual mold of White Males from the U.S.A to get into the sport. This has been successful as NASCAR is now the 2nd most popular sport in Mexico, behind Soccer. Juan Pablo Montoya is a growing star and has a huge fan base among Hispanic Americans and among our neighbors to the south. His fan base would not be growing if he wasn't improving as a driver and as a personality in the sport.
The point I am making here is that if there is an environment that encourages and supports success, successful people will come from that environment. at the same time, if there is an environment that stifles success, huge amounts of human potential can go to waste. America has an environment that has given more opportunity for success to the common man in the last 2 centuries than any nation in history. Now we have a bunch of politicians who want to take that away because of their own greed. That environment that has allowed and nurtured success is what has made America great, and now we are flirting with the slippery slope of throwing it all away.
Right on. Collectivism kills intellectual ferment and the free thought that fuels it, leading a society to mediocrity. Take away incentives and the inventors and entrepreneurs turn their attentions to less risky, less productive activities or move to where they can enjoy the fruits of their labors.

We should be particularly on guard when out collectivist progressives invoke Jesus Christ when talking about health care, immigration, etc.

As Senator Coburn says, it's not charity if you're doing it with confiscated money.
2 replies · active 798 weeks ago
** Collectivism kills intellectual ferment and the free thought that fuels it,**

It is the very reason that the Chinese today, even with the intellectual manpower they have, can not do much but copy technology.
I have just had a week long debate with some folks who do exactly as FoutC mentioned. They claim that Jesus would be a liberal, would love everybody whether gay or straight and would encourage socialism. This is not a religious blog, but the teachings of Jesus were all about working for yourself, not depending on the group and giving willingly. There is no teaching anywhere in the Bible about wanting government to support the masses. The government Jesus endured was Roman and they were not exactly about feeding the masses or free health care. In fact their only agenda was conquering neighboring tribal nations and taxing them dry. When they taxed everything they could conquer dry, the Roman empire imploded under mass monetary inflation, an inability to keep it's borders closed and overall lack of motivation and innovation. (sound familiar?) Christianity is not political unless politicians or a government inhibit a Christians' ability to worship freely. Anyone saying otherwise is flat out wrong.
"Mediocrity and dishonesty have proven to be invaluable traits for professional survival."

These are also the traits of most people who succeed in corporate America. (Trust me, I live it every day.) It's a problem rife among our leadership, and not likely, unfortunately, to change any time soon.

Nice to see you posting here, kmbr.
Wow. What a way to start! This is exactly why I wanted her over here folks.
3 replies · active 798 weeks ago
I agree and not only is her first subject excellent on it's own, it inspires discussion which is even better. I figured when you asked her to join, her content and writing style would be excellent and it is. I'm glad you brought her on board as I think it will motivate us to do better and that helps everyone (if you buy into the team notion that really good team players make those around them better)
Oh I absolutely think so. Look at how much discussion we are already having. She's a sharp cookie.

-Sent from my iPhone
As I said when you texted me about picking her, I know that you will make good decisions when it comes to administrating this blog. You are a good person and a patriotic American and I know you would seek such qualities in picking contributors. I think she is a good choice. Another aspect that I think will benefit is the time aspect. She posts when we are asleep due to the time difference so on most days like today, we will wake up to a new fresh post to read. I really liked that this morning as I had not seen any news or heard any talk radio so I was able to read her post without any preconceived notions or biases. It was a good way to start the day.
I'm studying to be a mechanical engineer in empathisis in alternate fuel engines. I'm no green, I want to create such an engine so we can finally give the Muslim world the middle finger and eliminate our political need to appease them. Why would I if I'm going to be penaltized or be placed on the same merit scale as a dishwasher? Why not just be a dishwasher then? Why go through all this schooling or make all these sacrifice to be an engineer (or a doctor as my wife wants to be) only to be rewarded the same as a dishwasher or cashier. I don't disrespect dishwasher and cashiers, but they don't inspires us to do so for a lifetime as they don't better ourselves.
As for those that think Jesus would be a socalist liberal haven't read the book of John very well. When he was in (gosh I can't spell those names) Gallilee, a crowd was so awed and inspired by his miracles that they were going to proclaim him King. He fled when he saw this. If human government is the pinancle of excellence, then why didn't he accepted his ordination. He rejected it because he rejects human government as being the source of enpowerment and enrichment of the people.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Blog Widget by LinkWithin