There is a very dim light at the end of the tunnel when CA is not toeing the Left Wing Loon MoonBat party line. I fully expected the Government of CA to reject a legal vote of the public to change their constitution. But in a stunning upset; the Courts did their job appropriately and got it right. Now how do we break it to the gay/lesbian/bi/transgendered/polyamorous/ community that the people of California have spoken 3 times and the Supreme Court of CA finally held up that the PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN. There is no where else to go; there is no higher authority on this. A woman on the news said that "no civil rights movement has ever failed" well, not to put too fine a point on it; the 60's civil rights movement was a HUMAN rights movement on an entire ethnic group of people based on something that had no bearing on actual behavior. I am not going to get into the debate as to whether homosexuality is a choice or a genetic thing. I will tell you that the issue is one of BEHAVIOR though. This is not about Sexism or Racism and it is a fallacy that the GLBTP community tries to draw a paralell between what Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks and others did, and trying to validate a behavior and really not even that.
NO ONE HAS EVER SAID not to allow them all the rights and priveleges of marriage, what has been said repeatedly is that it is not marriage, call it something else and we will be happy. I am for them having FMLA, Funeral leave, even what meager tax breaks married couples have, just leave marriage between a man and a woman.
As I have said before and I will say again, Once you redefine marriage to between WW, or MM, instead of between MW, then there is nothing to keep if from being MMWWW;WMW, Man and Sheep, whatever. It will be anything goes and there would be no legal way to say "just this; but not that"
So there is hope; it CAN be done.
May 27, 2009
Logging you in...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Andrew33 103p · 827 weeks ago
KOOK 91p · 827 weeks ago
IT IS NOTHING OF THE SORT.
KOOK 91p · 827 weeks ago
The argument can be made that Violent Sociopaths are not making a choice, but are biologically driven, we do not condone their behavior in murdering people either. Kleptomaniacs may have a biological disorder, but we do not allow them to shoplift what they want.
KOOK 91p · 827 weeks ago
They are a bunch of cry babies. They want to feel OK and they don't. It is not enough that they are Gay and we do not care, we have to have our faces rubbed in it so they can feel "normal" or something.
For the record: if you are gay, I don't care. I don't want to know all the sordid details, but it is your business. I have had friends that are gay, I make no value judgements on them, but I would not go to the gay bar with them if I was asked (which I have not been). I am not afraid of gays, but I dont want to take showers with them either.
Andrew33 103p · 827 weeks ago
Being born homosexual is a myth. Think about it, people born homosexual would not reproduce so the genes would not get passed on. If one believes scientific theories about DNA, how does one argue this?
Homosexual civil rights is also a myth. Civil rights guarantees rights to those who are born differently than the majority or those in power. People are born male or female, black, brown or white. If they change that, it is their own doing and that doesn't change who they are underneath. Civil rights is an attempt to level the playing field for those who before now didn't have equal opportunities. If I poke my eyes out, should I be given special rights because I blinded myself? If so, why? If not, then just because I go do something that 98% percent of the population finds repulsive like homosexuality, why should I then be given special rights?
Homosexual Marriage is also a myth. Speaking as a Christian here: Marriage is intended to be an act that is meant to please God. It is still a religious ceremony for a reason. All 3 monotheistic religions frown strongly on homosexuality. The militant homosexual agenda is ultimately an atheist anti-Christian agenda. I realize that this is a secular blog and so I separate my writings as a Christian and post them in a different place.
Christians are not "homophobic" but instead simply want to be left alone in their worship. How often do you see Christians engaging in anti-homo marches or having hetero-sex/holding hands, etc in front of homosexuals to offend them? Can the same be said for homosexuals? That is why "homophobic" is the biggest myth of all.
The sad thing is that many homosexuals believe their own propaganda.
KOOK 91p · 827 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 827 weeks ago
I too can use many arguments whether they be scientific, religious, historical or political to give reasons why homosexual marriage is wrong. I'm glad though to see others drawing the line in the sand there and willing to stand up to those trying to destroy our society from within.
Andrew33 103p · 827 weeks ago
KOOK 91p · 827 weeks ago
Andrew33 103p · 827 weeks ago
My point was that your arguments and viewpoints represent many non-Christians in their beliefs at least from my point of view. You simply use viewpoints other than religion or faith which would have been a better way to make my point.